![]() ![]() ![]() This article critically considers dominant and intersecting cultural and legal narratives about sexting and troubles the predominant construction of teenage female sexters as dupes of the ‘pornification’ of a generation and as ‘self-sexually exploiting.’ The cultural and legal disavowal of girls’ narratives about digital sexual expression is considered through Judith Butler’s poststructural analysis of sexuality, speech and censorship. Mitchell, the first case to challenge the constitutionality of prosecuting teens for their digital sexual expression. Three girls refused the ultimatum, resulting in Miller v. In response to this phenomenon, Pennsylvania District Attorney Skumanick threatened to bring child pornography charges against teenagers who had been caught sexting and who refused to attend a gender-based ‘re-education’ program designed to teach them about its dangers. Recently, national and local media across North America have warned against the risks of ‘sexting’ – the practice of sending, posting or possessing sexually suggestive text messages and images via cell phones or the Internet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |